[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VeYkh4hHtLbjWwVZjT=wGp0wrq_k6XiLuFF62L2MiRVxg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 09:47:45 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Tom Lanyon <tom@...shoeco.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@...l.com>,
Jérôme de Bretagne
<jerome.debretagne@...il.com>, "Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / sleep: EC-based wakeup from suspend-to-idle on
recent systems
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Tom Lanyon <tom@...shoeco.com> wrote:
> On 23 June 2017 at 12:40, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> Linux during s2idle => 6% battery drain per hour.
> Win10 during sleep => 1% battery drain per hour.
>
> where Linux = 4.12-rc6 + the latest patch from your acpi-pm-test branch.
>
> So whilst s2idle halves the battery drain compared to the machine
> staying powered on, it's still significantly more draining than Win10.
> Let me know if there's any more useful analysis I can do.
Tom, thanks for this.
I would speculate that the problem might be in the certain device
drivers. It would be nice to get statistics which wakeup source
generates more hits.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists