[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.20.1706270958520.30709@cbobk.fhfr.pm>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 10:00:23 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
cc: tip-bot for Michal Hocko <tipbot@...or.com>,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
mingo@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, mhocko@...e.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, davej@...emonkey.org.uk, peterz@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/mm] x86/mmap, ASLR: Do not treat unlimited-stack tasks
as legacy mmap
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > We added a heuristics to treat applications with RLIMIT_STACK configured
> > to unlimited as legacy. This means:
>
> To me this also means a minor security problem. The comment above
> PER_CLEAR_ON_SETID says "must be cleared upon setuid or setgid exec",
> but if you do "ulimit -s unlimited" before suid exec then
> ADDR_COMPAT_LAYOUT set by security checks will be ignored.
Could you please be a bit more specific here?
mmap_is_legacy() *first* checks for the ADDR_COMPAT_LAYOUT in the
personality flags, and only then, if it's unset, RLIMIT_STACK comes to
play.
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists