[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ec4a5fec-fea0-09a7-8559-99d8eb071093@ozlabs.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 09:06:04 +0800
From: Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>
To: Eddie James <eajames@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
wsa@...-dreams.de, robh+dt@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
joel@....id.au, andrew@...id.au,
"Edward A. James" <eajames@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] Documentation/devicetree: Add FSI-attached I2C master
dt bindings
Hi Eddie,
> +Required properties:
> + - compatible = "ibm,i2cm-fsi";
> + - reg = < address size >; : The FSI CFAM address and address space
> + size.
> + - #address-cells = <1>; : Number of address cells in child nodes
> + - #size-cells = <0>; : Number of size cells in child nodes.
> + - child nodes : Nodes to describe ports off the I2C
> + master.
> +
> +Child node required properties:
> + - reg = < port number > : The port number on the I2C master.
> +
> +Examples:
> +
> + i2cm@...0 {
> + compatible = "ibm,i2cm-fsi";
> + reg = < 0x1800 0x400 >;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + port@0 {
> + reg = <0>;
> + };
> +
> + port@1 {
> + reg = <1>;
> + };
> + };
Those child nodes represent the downstream i2c buses, and so also
contain the i2c slave devices, right? If so, you may want to document
that, and/or add a simple device to that example (say, an EEPROM).
Cheers,
Jeremy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists