[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170627120626.GA21666@home>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 15:06:26 +0300
From: Roman Storozhenko <romeusmeister@...il.com>
To: kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: christoffer.dall@...aro.org, marc.zyngier@....com,
pbonzini@...hat.com, rkrcmar@...hat.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Replaces 'unsigned' with 'unsigned int' in the
codebase
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 12:01:25PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 27/06/2017 11:54, Roman Storozhenko wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Roman Storozhenko <romeusmeister@...il.com>
> > ---
> > virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 2 +-
> > virt/kvm/coalesced_mmio.c | 2 +-
> > virt/kvm/eventfd.c | 10 ++++++----
> > virt/kvm/irqchip.c | 7 ++++---
> > virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> > 5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> This change is pointless. Contributors to KVM should know what
> "unsigned" means.
Paolo, thanks that you mentioned this. But I have a question - is this just
useless or this is an error?
I saw many places in the codebase where 'unsigned int' is used. That why I
decided to make the codebase more standartized from the style point of
view.
Thanks, Roman Storozhenko.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists