lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 14:49:40 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org, "Ilya V. Matveychikov" <matvejchikov@...il.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: [PATCH 4.4 03/26] lib/cmdline.c: fix get_options() overflow while parsing ranges 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Ilya Matveychikov <matvejchikov@...il.com> commit a91e0f680bcd9e10c253ae8b62462a38bd48f09f upstream. When using get_options() it's possible to specify a range of numbers, like 1-100500. The problem is that it doesn't track array size while calling internally to get_range() which iterates over the range and fills the memory with numbers. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/2613C75C-B04D-4BFF-82A6-12F97BA0F620@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ilya V. Matveychikov <matvejchikov@...il.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> --- lib/cmdline.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/lib/cmdline.c +++ b/lib/cmdline.c @@ -22,14 +22,14 @@ * the values[M, M+1, ..., N] into the ints array in get_options. */ -static int get_range(char **str, int *pint) +static int get_range(char **str, int *pint, int n) { int x, inc_counter, upper_range; (*str)++; upper_range = simple_strtol((*str), NULL, 0); inc_counter = upper_range - *pint; - for (x = *pint; x < upper_range; x++) + for (x = *pint; n && x < upper_range; x++, n--) *pint++ = x; return inc_counter; } @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ char *get_options(const char *str, int n break; if (res == 3) { int range_nums; - range_nums = get_range((char **)&str, ints + i); + range_nums = get_range((char **)&str, ints + i, nints - i); if (range_nums < 0) break; /*
Powered by blists - more mailing lists