linux-kernel - Re: userspace regression with hwmon

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5ce4bea5-008a-8a86-cdf4-83d0f427126c@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Tue, 27 Jun 2017 05:52:39 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc:     Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: userspace regression with hwmon

On 06/27/2017 05:23 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:06:11AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 03:33:20PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>>> Hi Guenter, Jean,
>>>
>>> The patch d72d19c26c41 ("hwmon: (coretemp) Convert to use
>>> devm_hwmon_device_register_with_groups") has changed the location of the
>>> sysfs nodes from /sys/devices/platform/coretemp.0/ to
>>> /sys/devices/platform/coretemp.0/hwmon/hwmon0/ and that has broken
>>> some of our usespace applications when we have updated the kernel from
>>> v3.8 to v4.4. For now I am reverting that said patch in our production
>>> kernel (based on v4.4) but that is not an elegant solution.
>>> Do you have any other reports like this? I am sure changing the paths
>>> upstream will now break some other userspace. So, what can be an elegant
>>> solution to our problem? or do we always need to carry an out-of-tree
>>> patch for our production kernel?
>>>
>>
>> The problem only occurs if attributes are accessed using the raw path,
>> and if user space does not take into account that attributes may reside
>> in the hwmon directory (/sys/class/hwmon/hwmonX) _or_ in the device
>> directory (/sys/class/hwmon/hwmonX/device). There is no guarantee that
>> the raw path doesn't change from release to release; that is what the
>> symlinks are for. Actually, I have seen the raw platform device path
>> change over time, so I am surprised that this never affected you.
> 
> Well, using the raw platform device path was a bad design decision.
> But I still see a difference. In v3.8 all the temp* nodes were in
> /sys/class/hwmon/hwmon0/device/ but in v4.4 I can see that they are in
> /sys/class/hwmon/hwmon0/. So if we do modify the code, then we still
> need to have two versions of userspace code based on the kernel.
> 

Your code should check for the 'name' attribute in both locations.

Guenter