[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170627225356.318f81d3c687973b7f4f49b1@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 22:53:56 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] ftrace: WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 09:29:26 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 20:51:26 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > Hello Steve,
> >
> > I've faced the following RCU warning while I ran ftracetest testcase
> > "ftrace - function graph filters with stack tracer" on qemu.
> > The kernel is ftrace/core branch.
> >
> > [ 10.919174] =============================
> > [ 10.920077] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
> > [ 10.920977] 4.12.0-rc5+ #1 Not tainted
> > [ 10.921828] -----------------------------
> > [ 10.922748] /home/mhiramat/ksrc/linux/include/trace/events/rcu.h:454 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
> > [ 10.924761]
> > [ 10.924761] other info that might help us debug this:
> > [ 10.924761]
> > [ 10.926775]
> > [ 10.926775] RCU used illegally from idle CPU!
> > [ 10.926775] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
> > [ 10.929176] RCU used illegally from extended quiescent state!
> > [ 10.930525] no locks held by swapper/7/0.
> > [ 10.931547]
> > [ 10.931547] stack backtrace:
> > [ 10.932777] CPU: 7 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/7 Not tainted 4.12.0-rc5+ #1
> > [ 10.934025] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.9.3-1.fc25 04/01/2014
> > [ 10.935869] Call Trace:
> > [ 10.936550] dump_stack+0x86/0xcf
> > [ 10.937359] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xc5/0x100
> > [ 10.938327] ? rcu_eqs_exit_common.isra.53+0x5/0x150
>
> > [ 10.939229] rcu_irq_enter+0x18d/0x1a0
>
> Strange, it triggered in rcu_irq_enter()?
>
> > [ 10.939902] ? rcu_eqs_exit_common.isra.53+0x5/0x150
> > [ 10.940683] check_stack+0xbb/0x2f0
> > [ 10.941333] stack_trace_call+0x3f/0x50
> > [ 10.942010] 0xffffffffa0000077
> > [ 10.942620] ? ftrace_graph_caller+0x78/0xa8
> > [ 10.943342] ? rcu_eqs_exit_common.isra.53+0x5/0x150
> > [ 10.944214] ? rcu_idle_exit+0x5/0x90
>
> > [ 10.944937] rcu_eqs_exit_common.isra.53+0x5/0x150
>
> Hmm, we are tracing rcu_eqs_exit_common.
>
>
> Do you have this commit in this branch?
>
> Commit 03ecd3f4 "rcu/tracing: Add rcu_disabled to denote when
> rcu_irq_enter() will not work"
Yes, that is merged.
Hmm, I'll check this is correctly enabled again, since this time
I couldn't reproduce it.
Thank you,
>
> -- Steve
>
> > [ 10.945754] rcu_idle_exit+0x8c/0x90
> > [ 10.946612] ? rcu_eqs_exit_common.isra.53+0x5/0x150
> > [ 10.947414] ? rcu_idle_exit+0x8c/0x90
> > [ 10.948091] do_idle+0x116/0x1c0
> > [ 10.948797] cpu_startup_entry+0x1d/0x20
> > [ 10.949569] start_secondary+0xfa/0x100
> > [ 10.950335] secondary_startup_64+0x9f/0x9f
> > [ 10.951182]
> >
> > I attached full log and kconfig. I can reproduce it with just running
> > following script.
> >
> > ----
> > cd tools/testing/selftests/ftrace
> > while true; do
> > ./ftracetest test.d/ftrace/fgraph-filter-stack.tc
> > done
> > ----
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists