lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170627141404.GA7300@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 27 Jun 2017 16:14:04 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)" <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Cc:     Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy <glebfm@...linux.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Lin <dtwlin@...gle.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Anton V. Boyarshinov" <boyarsh@...linux.org>,
        "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 031/108] jump label: pass kbuild_cflags when checking
 for asm goto support

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 01:44:06PM +0000, Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin) wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 01:33:42PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 06:29:18PM +0300, Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 07:52:37PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >> > 4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >> >
> >> > ------------------
> >> >
> >> > From: David Lin <dtwlin@...gle.com>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > [ Upstream commit 35f860f9ba6aac56cc38e8b18916d833a83f1157 ]
> >>
> >> This commit introduced a regression which was fixed in
> >> 7292ae3d5a18fb922be496e6bb687647193569b4.
> >> Backport the fix too, please.
> >>
> >> As long as there is no gcc-plugin support in 4.4, 35f860f9ba6a does not
> >> break anything there, AFAICS.
> >
> >Thanks for letting me know, now queued up.
> 
> Hey Greg,
> 
> I've also queued this up in the pull request I sent a few days ago, you'll
> end up seeing a conflict when you look at that branch.

Not a problem, when I merge yours in, I take them as individual patches,
which allows me to drop them easily for stuff like this.

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ