lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <171ae8ff-2af2-65e3-9796-308b21976876@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 27 Jun 2017 11:21:17 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, lorenzo.pieralisi@....com
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@...il.com>,
        "maintainer:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
        Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
        Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        Markus Mayer <mmayer@...adcom.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>,
        Justin Chen <justinpopo6@...il.com>,
        Doug Berger <opendmb@...il.com>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:BROADCOM BCM47XX MIPS ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernerl.org,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, will.deacon@....com,
        catalin.marinas@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] misc: sram: Allow ARM64 to select SRAM_EXEC

On 06/27/2017 10:38 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 03:32:42PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> Now that ARM64 also has a fncpy() implementation, allow selection
>> SRAM_EXEC for ARM64 as well.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> 
> Sorr,y but I must NAK this patch.
> 
> As mentioned on prior threads regarding fncpy, I do not think it makes
> sense to enable this for arm64. The only use-cases that have been
> described so far for this are power-management stuff that should live in
> PSCI or other secure FW, and have no place in the kernel on arm64

This is a valid reason, but this is only one use case presented, the
only thing is that we need to make sure, as patch reviewers and you guys
as architecture maintainers, that this is not used as a means to bypass
PSCI for suspend/resume operation, which I now agree with.

Still, the general use case remains: you have a piece of addressable
memory which can be used to allocate space from and relocate code to be
it for security, performance, predictability, isolation, or anything,
and that should be possible given standard kernel facilities offered by
the SRAM driver.

> > There are no other users of this functionality, and until there are, I
> see no reason to enable this, and risk a proliferation of unnecessary
> platform-specific code.
> 
> It should be possible to #ifdef-ise the relevant callers of this such
> that they can be built on arm64 without using fncpy or sram_exec
> functionality. AFAICT, there are no users on arm64 introduced by this
> series.

I sent this patch accidentally as part of this patch series anyway, so
if you want to keep the discussion alive, reply here:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9793745/

> 
> Thanks,
> Mark.
> 
>> ---
>>  drivers/misc/Kconfig | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/misc/Kconfig b/drivers/misc/Kconfig
>> index 07bbd4cc1852..ac8779278c0c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/misc/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/misc/Kconfig
>> @@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ config SRAM
>>  	bool "Generic on-chip SRAM driver"
>>  	depends on HAS_IOMEM
>>  	select GENERIC_ALLOCATOR
>> -	select SRAM_EXEC if ARM
>> +	select SRAM_EXEC if ARM || ARM64
>>  	help
>>  	  This driver allows you to declare a memory region to be managed by
>>  	  the genalloc API. It is supposed to be used for small on-chip SRAM
>> -- 
>> 2.9.3
>>


-- 
Florian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ