[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADZGycbxQq3TewS7VBDo9PzeY7nm1scYD=teFQaURKVEdoBGYA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 15:28:59 +0800
From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memory_hotplug: just build zonelist for new added node
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz> wrote:
> On 06/26/2017 05:58 AM, Wei Yang wrote:
>> In commit (9adb62a5df9c0fbef7) "mm/hotplug: correctly setup fallback
>> zonelists when creating new pgdat" tries to build the correct zonelist for
>> a new added node, while it is not necessary to rebuild it for already exist
>> nodes.
>>
>> In build_zonelists(), it will iterate on nodes with memory. For a new added
>> node, it will have memory until node_states_set_node() is called in
>
> it will not have memory
>
No memory at this point.
> right?
>
>> online_pages().
>>
>> This patch will avoid to rebuild the zonelists for already exist nodes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
>
> Sounds correct, as far as the memory hotplug mess allows.
>
> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
>
> Some style nitpicks below:
>
>> ---
>> mm/page_alloc.c | 16 +++++++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
>> index 560eafe8234d..fc8181b44fd8 100644
>> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
>> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
>> @@ -5200,15 +5200,17 @@ static int __build_all_zonelists(void *data)
>> memset(node_load, 0, sizeof(node_load));
>> #endif
>>
>> - if (self && !node_online(self->node_id)) {
>> + /* This node is hotadded and no memory preset yet.
>
> On multiline comments, the first line should be empty after "/*"
>
Thanks, I will pay attention next time.
> But I see Andrew already fixed that.
>
>> + * So just build zonelists is fine, no need to touch other nodes.
>> + */
>> + if (self && !node_online(self->node_id))
>> build_zonelists(self);
>> - }
>> -
>> - for_each_online_node(nid) {
>> - pg_data_t *pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid);
>> + else
>> + for_each_online_node(nid) {
>> + pg_data_t *pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid);
>>
>> - build_zonelists(pgdat);
>> - }
>> + build_zonelists(pgdat);
>> + }
>
> Personally I would use { } for the else block, and thus leave them also
> for the if block, not sure if this is recommended by the style guide though.
>
I am not quite sure about this. The checkpatch.py script doesn't complain.
Thanks for your comment again~
>> /*
>> * Initialize the boot_pagesets that are going to be used
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists