[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170628093627.GD14532@8bytes.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 11:36:27 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, xen-devel@...ts.xen.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>,
Toshimitsu Kani <toshi.kani@....com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Larry Woodman <lwoodman@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 RESEND 27/38] iommu/amd: Allow the AMD IOMMU to work
with memory encryption
Hi Tom,
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 10:12:30AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> ---
> drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++--------------
> drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_init.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_proto.h | 10 ++++++++++
> drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_types.h | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
Looks like a straightforward change. Just one nit below.
> +static bool amd_iommu_supports_sme(void)
> +{
> + if (!sme_active() || (boot_cpu_data.x86 != 0x17))
> + return true;
> +
> + /* For Fam17h, a specific level of support is required */
> + if (boot_cpu_data.microcode >= 0x08001205)
> + return true;
> +
> + if ((boot_cpu_data.microcode >= 0x08001126) &&
> + (boot_cpu_data.microcode <= 0x080011ff))
> + return true;
> +
> + pr_notice("AMD-Vi: IOMMU not currently supported when SME is active\n");
> +
> + return false;
> +}
The name of the function is misleading. It checks whether the IOMMU can
be enabled when SME is active. But the name suggests that it checks
whether the iommu hardware supports SME.
How about renaming it to amd_iommu_sme_check()?
With that change the patch is:
Acked-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists