linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/2] bcache: Update continue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170628114818.c7avv5773pa4gb37@mwanda>
Date:   Wed, 28 Jun 2017 14:48:18 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>
Cc:     Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Coly Li <colyli@...e.de>,
        Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>,
        linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] bcache: Update continue_at() documentation

continue_at() doesn't have a return statement anymore.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>

diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/closure.h b/drivers/md/bcache/closure.h
index 1ec84ca81146..295b7e43f92c 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/closure.h
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/closure.h
@@ -312,8 +312,6 @@ static inline void closure_wake_up(struct closure_waitlist *list)
  * been dropped with closure_put()), it will resume execution at @fn running out
  * of @wq (or, if @wq is NULL, @fn will be called by closure_put() directly).
  *
- * NOTE: This macro expands to a return in the calling function!
- *
  * This is because after calling continue_at() you no longer have a ref on @cl,
  * and whatever @cl owns may be freed out from under you - a running closure fn
  * has a ref on its own closure which continue_at() drops.
@@ -340,8 +338,6 @@ do {									\
  * Causes @fn to be executed out of @cl, in @wq context (or called directly if
  * @wq is NULL).
  *
- * NOTE: like continue_at(), this macro expands to a return in the caller!
- *
  * The ref the caller of continue_at_nobarrier() had on @cl is now owned by @fn,
  * thus it's not safe to touch anything protected by @cl after a
  * continue_at_nobarrier().