linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: rts5208 : Fixing coding style warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170628120021.GA10355@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 28 Jun 2017 14:00:21 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Simo Koskinen <koskisoft@...il.com>
Cc:     arushisinghal19971997@...il.com, wporter82@...il.com,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, julia.lawall@...6.fr,
        namrataashettar@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        sergio.paracuellos@...il.com, baijiaju1990@....com,
        weiyongjun1@...wei.com, quexint@...il.com, jrickertkc@...il.com,
        colin.king@...onical.com, dilekuzulmez@...il.com,
        aquannie@...il.com, bankarsandhya512@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rts5208 : Fixing coding style warnings

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 11:15:09AM +0200, Simo Koskinen wrote:
> Fixed following warnings found by checkpatch.pl script:
> 
> WARNING: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using 'xxxx',
> this function's name, in a string
> 
> Signed-off-by: Simo Koskinen <koskisoft@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.c      |  2 +-
>  drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_chip.c |  5 +++--
>  drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c        |  8 +++++---
>  drivers/staging/rts5208/spi.c       |  9 +++++----
>  drivers/staging/rts5208/xd.c        | 11 ++++++-----
>  5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.c b/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.c
> index b8177f5..6c7485f 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.c
> @@ -1009,7 +1009,7 @@ static void rtsx_remove(struct pci_dev *pci)
>  {
>  	struct rtsx_dev *dev = pci_get_drvdata(pci);
>  
> -	dev_info(&pci->dev, "rtsx_remove() called\n");
> +	dev_info(&pci->dev, "%s() called\n", __func__);

This should just be removed entirely, ftrace provides this functionality
if a developer really needs it.

>  
>  	quiesce_and_remove_host(dev);
>  	release_everything(dev);
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_chip.c b/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_chip.c
> index 7f4107b..4895579 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_chip.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_chip.c
> @@ -616,8 +616,9 @@ int rtsx_reset_chip(struct rtsx_chip *chip)
>  		else
>  			retval = rtsx_pre_handle_sdio_new(chip);
>  
> -		dev_dbg(rtsx_dev(chip), "chip->need_reset = 0x%x (rtsx_reset_chip)\n",
> -			(unsigned int)(chip->need_reset));
> +		dev_dbg(rtsx_dev(chip), "chip->need_reset = 0x%x (%s)\n",
> +			(unsigned int)(chip->need_reset),
> +			__func__);
>  #else  /* HW_AUTO_SWITCH_SD_BUS */
>  		retval = rtsx_pre_handle_sdio_old(chip);
>  #endif  /* HW_AUTO_SWITCH_SD_BUS */
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c b/drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c
> index c2eb072..e3a92b0 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c
> @@ -910,7 +910,8 @@ static int sd_change_phase(struct rtsx_chip *chip, u8 sample_point, u8 tune_dir)
>  	int retval;
>  	bool ddr_rx = false;
>  
> -	dev_dbg(rtsx_dev(chip), "sd_change_phase (sample_point = %d, tune_dir = %d)\n",
> +	dev_dbg(rtsx_dev(chip), "%s (sample_point = %d, tune_dir = %d)\n",
> +		__func__,
>  		sample_point, tune_dir);

Please use your brain when making these changes.  Does that look correct
now?  Hint, it isn't, please merge with the next line...

> @@ -3575,8 +3576,9 @@ static int reset_mmc_only(struct rtsx_chip *chip)
>  		return STATUS_FAIL;
>  	}
>  
> -	dev_dbg(rtsx_dev(chip), "In reset_mmc_only, sd_card->sd_type = 0x%x\n",
> -		sd_card->sd_type);
> +	dev_dbg(rtsx_dev(chip), "In %s, sd_card->sd_type = 0x%x\n",
> +		__func__,
> +		sd_card->sd_type);

Same here.  Really, look at what you are doing...

> -	dev_dbg(rtsx_dev(chip), "spi_get_status: err_code = 0x%x\n",
> -		spi->err_code);
> +	dev_dbg(rtsx_dev(chip), "%s: err_code = 0x%x\n",
> +		__func__,
> +		spi->err_code);

And again...

Please fix up the whole patch and resend.

thanks,

greg k-h