linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] KVM: async_pf: Force a nested vmexit if the injected #PF is async

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 28 Jun 2017 22:17:54 +0800
From:   Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] KVM: async_pf: Force a nested vmexit if the
 injected #PF is async_pf

2017-06-28 22:11 GMT+08:00 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>:
>
>
> On 28/06/2017 16:09, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>>> Yes, this was my question essentially.  I would still migrate
>>> nested_apf_token (as part of nested virt state), and then clear it in
>>> KVM when doing the async-pf broadcast.
>> Do you mean I should save nested_apf_token by GET_VCPU_EVENTS and
>> restore it by SET_VCPU_EVENTS? I utilize the place of "u8 pad" in
>> kvm_vcpu_events to hold nested_apf, however nested_apf_token is
>> unsigned long.
>
> If for now we can leave out the GET/SET_VCPU_EVENTS changes, that would
> be best.  nested_apf and nested_apf_token should be migrated together
> with the rest of the nested virt state.

Radim explains why we at least needs nested_apf here:

> nested_apf is not #PF: if we didn't pass nested_apf, then the exception would be injected as #PF to L2 after migration.

Do you mean we can ignore it here and depends on Jim's patches to
completely handle it?

Regards,
Wanpeng Li