linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] MIPS: Miscellaneous fixes related to Android Mips emulator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170628163011.GA17042@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 28 Jun 2017 18:30:11 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.markovic@...rk.com>
Cc:     linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
        Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.markovic@...tec.com>,
        Douglas Leung <douglas.leung@...tec.com>,
        Goran Ferenc <goran.ferenc@...tec.com>,
        James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Miodrag Dinic <miodrag.dinic@...tec.com>,
        Paul Burton <paul.burton@...tec.com>,
        Petar Jovanovic <petar.jovanovic@...tec.com>,
        Raghu Gandham <raghu.gandham@...tec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] MIPS: Miscellaneous fixes related to Android Mips
 emulator

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 05:56:24PM +0200, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
> From: Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.markovic@...tec.com>
> 
> v1->v2:
> 
>     - the patch on PREF usage in memcpy dropped as not needed
>     - updated recipient lists using get_maintainer.pl
>     - rebased to the latest kernel code
> 
> This series contains an assortment of changes necessary for proper
> operation of Android emulator for Mips. However, we think that wider
> kernel community may benefit from them too.

This is nice, thanks for these.

How well does these patches "work" with the recent goldfish
images/kernels that are out there?  I know the goldfish platform has
been revamped a lot recently, and I would not like to see these changes
cause things to break there :)

Also, any chance to get some google reviewers for these changes?  I
don't think you added any to the cc: list, how come?

thanks,

greg k-h