[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALAqxLXL9XBO=HZ1Lwt=XW9FnFMvnXw8dn5bFb7_XcUFJgJUCA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 10:39:21 -0700
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To: Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] timekeeping: Use proper timekeeper for debug code
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com> wrote:
> When CONFIG_DEBUG_TIMEKEEPING is enabled the timekeeping_check_update()
> function will update status like last_warning and underflow_seen on the
> timekeeper.
>
> If there are issues found this state is used to rate limit the warnings
> that get printed.
>
> This rate limiting doesn't really really work if stored in real_tk as
> the shadow timekeeper is overwritten onto real_tk at the end of every
> update_wall_time() call, resetting last_warning and other statuses.
>
> Fix rate limiting by using the shadow_timekeeper for
> timekeeping_check_update().
>
> Fixes: commit 57d05a93ada7 ("time: Rework debugging variables so they aren't global")
> Signed-off-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>
Interesting! Thanks for submitting this! Out of curiosity, can you
also talk about the underlying issue that made you come across this
issue?
thanks
-john
Powered by blists - more mailing lists