linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fs: System memory leak when running HTX with T10 DIF enabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9308965a-f9c2-54b3-ae0c-65dcdd7514fb@fb.com>
Date:   Wed, 28 Jun 2017 12:57:50 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
CC:     Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>, <wenxiong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <bjking@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: System memory leak when running HTX with T10 DIF
 enabled

On 06/28/2017 12:52 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 12:44:00PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 06/28/2017 12:38 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 12:34:15PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>> That's what I sent out.
>>>
>>> Where?  Didn't see that anywhere..
>>
>> Looks like you weren't CC'ed on the original thread. About an hour ago.
>>
>>>> Here it is again. We should get this into 4.12,
>>>> so would be great with a review or two.
>>>
>>> Can we rename __bio_free to bio_uninit and add a comment to bio_init
>>> that it must be paried with bio_uninit?
>>
>> Let's keep it small for 4.12. We can do a cleanup on top of this for
>> 4.13.
> 
> The rename is two additional lines for the patch, it's not going to
> make a difference..

Sure, why not...

>>> Except for that this looks fine, although there are a lot more callers
>>> that should get this treatment..
>>
>> Should only be an issue for on-stack bio's, since we don't go through
>> the put/free path. Did a quick grep, looks like this is one of 3. One
>> is floppy, which probably neither has DIF or uses blk-throttle. Then
>> there's one in dm-bufio, didn't look too closely at that. Last one is
>> this one.
> 
> Well, it's really all callers but bio_alloc_bioset itself that
> will need this handling, as only bios that come from bio_alloc_bioset
> will be freed through bio_free.  Most of them probably don't
> support DIF, but they'll also miss the bio_disassociate_task call
> this way, and will leak I/O context and css references if block
> cgroup support is enabled.

I guess local allocs too will be affected.

I'm baffled we've had this issue for so long, and nobody's seen it.
I knew DIF was never used (basically), but blk-throttle must have some
users at least.



diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
index 888e7801c638..f877d5e6d17f 100644
--- a/block/bio.c
+++ b/block/bio.c
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ struct bio_vec *bvec_alloc(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nr, unsigned long *idx,
 	return bvl;
 }
 
-static void __bio_free(struct bio *bio)
+void bio_uninit(struct bio *bio)
 {
 	bio_disassociate_task(bio);
 
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ static void bio_free(struct bio *bio)
 	struct bio_set *bs = bio->bi_pool;
 	void *p;
 
-	__bio_free(bio);
+	bio_uninit(bio);
 
 	if (bs) {
 		bvec_free(bs->bvec_pool, bio->bi_io_vec, BVEC_POOL_IDX(bio));
@@ -271,6 +271,11 @@ static void bio_free(struct bio *bio)
 	}
 }
 
+/*
+ * Users of this function have their own bio allocation. Subsequently,
+ * they must remember to pair any call to bio_init() with bio_uninit()
+ * when IO has completed, or when the bio is released.
+ */
 void bio_init(struct bio *bio, struct bio_vec *table,
 	      unsigned short max_vecs)
 {
@@ -297,7 +302,7 @@ void bio_reset(struct bio *bio)
 {
 	unsigned long flags = bio->bi_flags & (~0UL << BIO_RESET_BITS);
 
-	__bio_free(bio);
+	bio_uninit(bio);
 
 	memset(bio, 0, BIO_RESET_BYTES);
 	bio->bi_flags = flags;
diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
index 519599dddd36..0a7404ef9335 100644
--- a/fs/block_dev.c
+++ b/fs/block_dev.c
@@ -263,7 +263,10 @@ __blkdev_direct_IO_simple(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
 		kfree(vecs);
 
 	if (unlikely(bio.bi_error))
-		return bio.bi_error;
+		ret = bio.bi_error;
+
+	bio_uninit(&bio);
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
diff --git a/include/linux/bio.h b/include/linux/bio.h
index d1b04b0e99cf..a7e29fa0981f 100644
--- a/include/linux/bio.h
+++ b/include/linux/bio.h
@@ -426,6 +426,7 @@ extern void bio_advance(struct bio *, unsigned);
 
 extern void bio_init(struct bio *bio, struct bio_vec *table,
 		     unsigned short max_vecs);
+extern void bio_uninit(struct bio *);
 extern void bio_reset(struct bio *);
 void bio_chain(struct bio *, struct bio *);
 

-- 
Jens Axboe