[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170628202621.GA19176@roeck-us.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 13:26:21 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Robb Glasser <rglasser@...gle.com>,
Richard Simmons <rssimmo@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: [media] uvcvideo: Prevent heap overflow in uvc driver
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 09:18:37PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
> On Wednesday 28 Jun 2017 20:59:17 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Wednesday 28 Jun 2017 07:36:43 Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 12:48:04PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > >> From: Robb Glasser <rglasser@...gle.com>
> > >>
> > >> The size of uvc_control_mapping is user controlled leading to a
> > >> potential heap overflow in the uvc driver. This adds a check to verify
> > >> the user provided size fits within the bounds of the defined buffer
> > >> size.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Robb Glasser <rglasser@...gle.com>
> > >> [groeck: cherry picked from
> > >>
> > >> https://source.codeaurora.org/quic/la/kernel/msm-3.10
> > >> commit b7b99e55bc7770187913ed092990852ea52d7892;
> > >> updated subject]
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> > >> ---
> > >> Fixes CVE-2017-0627.
> > >
> > > Please do not apply this patch. It is buggy.
> >
> > I apologize for not noticing the initial patch, even if it looks like it was
> > all for the best. Will you send a new version ?
> >
> > >> drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_ctrl.c | 3 +++
> > >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_ctrl.c
> > >> b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_ctrl.c index c2ee6e39fd0c..252ab991396f
> > >> 100644
> > >> --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_ctrl.c
> > >> +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_ctrl.c
> > >> @@ -1992,6 +1992,9 @@ int uvc_ctrl_add_mapping(struct uvc_video_chain
> > >> *chain,
> > >> if (!found)
> > >> return -ENOENT;
> > >>
> > >> + if (ctrl->info.size < mapping->size)
> > >> + return -EINVAL;
> > >> +
>
> By the way, I believe the right fix should be
>
> if (mapping->offset + mapping->size > ctrl->info.size * 8)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> Both mapping->offset and mapping->size are 8-bit integers, so there's no risk
> of overflow in the addition. If we want to safeguard against a possible future
> bug if the type of the fields change, we could add
>
> if (mapping->offset + mapping->size < mapping->offset)
> return -EINVAL;
>
I currently have this:
@@ -2004,6 +2004,13 @@ int uvc_ctrl_add_mapping(struct uvc_video_chain *chain,
goto done;
}
+ /* validate that the user provided bit-size and offset is valid */
+ if ((mapping->size > 32) ||
+ ((mapping->offset + mapping->size) > (ctrl->info.size * 8))) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto done;
+ }
+
list_for_each_entry(map, &ctrl->info.mappings, list) {
if (mapping->id == map->id) {
uvc_trace(UVC_TRACE_CONTROL, "Can't add mapping '%s', "
This version originates from Richard Simmons. Copying him to see if he wants
to submit it himself.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists