[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170629232627.GE6065@anatevka.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 17:26:27 -0600
From: Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@....com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: "linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] acpi, nfit: Use bus_dsm_mask for passthru
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 02:55:55PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@....com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 02:35:14PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@....com> wrote:
> >> > Populate bus_dsm_mask and use it to filter dsm calls that user can
> >> > make through the pass thru interface.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@....com>
> >> > ---
> >> > drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c | 5 +++++
> >> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
> >> > index b46fca2..971002b 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
> >> > @@ -253,6 +253,8 @@ int acpi_nfit_ctl(struct nvdimm_bus_descriptor *nd_desc, struct nvdimm *nvdimm,
> >> > cmd_name = nvdimm_bus_cmd_name(cmd);
> >> > cmd_mask = nd_desc->cmd_mask;
> >> > dsm_mask = cmd_mask;
> >> > + if (cmd == ND_CMD_CALL)
> >> > + dsm_mask = nd_desc->bus_dsm_mask;
> >> > desc = nd_cmd_bus_desc(cmd);
> >> > uuid = to_nfit_uuid(NFIT_DEV_BUS);
> >> > handle = adev->handle;
> >> > @@ -1624,6 +1626,9 @@ static void acpi_nfit_init_dsms(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc)
> >> > if (acpi_check_dsm(adev->handle, uuid, 1, 1ULL << i))
> >> > set_bit(i, &nd_desc->cmd_mask);
> >> > set_bit(ND_CMD_CALL, &nd_desc->cmd_mask);
> >> > + for (i = 0; i < ND_CMD_CALL; i++)
> >> > + if (acpi_check_dsm(adev->handle, uuid, 1, 1ULL << i))
> >> > + set_bit(i, &nd_desc->bus_dsm_mask);
> >> > }
> >>
> >> This loop checks for function 6 which is specified as reserved. Lets
> >> explicitly test for the known good function numbers with something
> >> like this:
> >>
> >> /* this should be private in drivers/acpi/nfit/nfit.h */
> >> enum nfit_aux_cmds {
> >> NFIT_CMD_TRANSLATE_SPA = 5,
> >> NFIT_CMD_ARS_INJECT_SET = 7,
> >> NFIT_CMD_ARS_INJECT_CLEAR = 8,
> >> NFIT_CMD_ARS_INJECT_GET = 9,
> >> };
> >>
> >> bus_dsm_mask =
> >> (1 << ND_CMD_ARS_CAP) |
> >> (1 << ND_CMD_ARS_START) |
> >> (1 << ND_CMD_ARS_STATUS) |
> >> (1 << ND_CMD_CLEAR_ERROR) |
> >> (1 << NFIT_CMD_TRANSLATE_SPA) |
> >> (1 << NFIT_CMD_ARS_INJECT_SET) |
> >> (1 << NFIT_CMD_ARS_INJECT_CLEAR) |
> >> (1 << NFIT_CMD_ARS_INJECT_GET);
> >>
> >> for_each_set_bit(i, &bus_dsm_mask...
> >
> >
> > I added the for_each_set_bit check in patch 7 of the series.
>
> True, but in a patch series we shouldn't introduce a bug in one patch
> and fix it later in the same series. Also, if patch7 goes away we
> would need to fold that enabling in here.
>
A bug? What bad thing happens?
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jerry Hoemann Software Engineer Hewlett Packard Enterprise
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Powered by blists - more mailing lists