linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ib_isert: prevent NULL pointer dereference in isert_login_recv

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7f1b1f07-0670-10ee-620d-0ab3b1a6c2bf@grimberg.me>
Date:   Thu, 29 Jun 2017 11:28:40 +0300
From:   Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
To:     Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@...il.com>
Cc:     "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>,
        Robert LeBlanc <robert@...lancnet.us>,
        Sean Jenkins <sean@...terservers.com>,
        Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
        Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
        linux-rdma <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        target-devel <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ib_isert: prevent NULL pointer dereference in
 isert_login_recv_done()


>> Can you test just the one liner fix below?
>>
>>>> @@ -1452,7 +1452,7 @@
>>>>   isert_login_recv_done(struct ib_cq *cq, struct ib_wc *wc)
>>>>   {
>>>>   	struct isert_conn *isert_conn = wc->qp->qp_context;
>>>> -	struct ib_device *ib_dev = isert_conn->cm_id->device;
>>>> +	struct ib_device *ib_dev = isert_conn->device->ib_device;
>>>>   	if (unlikely(wc->status != IB_WC_SUCCESS)) {
>>>>   		isert_print_wc(wc, "login recv");
> 
> I'll test also this one-liner fix as soon as I can.
> 
> But I can say that I'm pretty sure it will work as well, because all the
> previous NULL pointer dereferences that we've got in the past happened
> all 100% in isert_login_recv_done(). The other cases are probably a safe
> precaution, but they can't really happen.

Agree, I'd prefer to start with a surgical fix before moving forward.