[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1498727494.4826.84.camel@rf-debian.wolfsonmicro.main>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 10:11:34 +0100
From: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
<gnurou@...il.com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<jason@...edaemon.net>, <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
<patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
<linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/17] mfd: madera: Add register definitions for
Cirrus Logic Madera codecs
On Wed, 2017-06-28 at 20:26 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 09:33:38AM +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 11:07 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > > For my own reference:
> > > Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
>
> > Can I suggest that you take this patch into the mfd tree? Other
> > subsystem maintainers will have to base on that but it avoids me keeping
> > emailing out nearly 9000 lines of register definitions each time I do an
> > update to the other patches in the chain.
>
> Yes, please! It also helps other maintainers see that the early bits of
> the series we depend on are making progress.
I guess taking all the MFD code when Lee is happy with it would also be
acceptable? There's several multi-thousand-line files in there too.
There are build dependencies between the subsystems but I don't know how
the maintainers prefer to deal with that - keep the patches as a set or
cross-merge branches.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists