| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <01e12a9a-4f3b-1bde-473a-3cbe3f72ef74@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 11:48:36 +0200
From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>
To: Abhishek Sahu <absahu@...eaurora.org>, dwmw2@...radead.org,
computersforpeace@...il.com, boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com,
richard@....at, cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr, robh+dt@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com
Cc: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
andy.gross@...aro.org, architt@...eaurora.org,
sricharan@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/14] qcom: mtd: nand: add and initialize QPIC DMA
resources
On 06/29/2017 09:15 AM, Abhishek Sahu wrote:
> 1. The QPIC NAND uses 3 BAM channels: command, data tx and
> data rx while EBI2 NAND uses only single ADM channel.
>
> 2. The EBI2 NAND uses normal register read buffer since this
> buffer will be remapped with dma_map_sg. The QPIC NAND will give
> register read buffer in command descriptor and the command
> descriptor will be mapped with dma_map_sg so the register buffer
> should be DMA coherent.
>
> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu <absahu@...eaurora.org>
The patch does two things, so make two patches. Also split the DT
changes into separate patch ...
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/qcom_nandc.txt | 25 +++--
> drivers/mtd/nand/qcom_nandc.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/qcom_nandc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/qcom_nandc.txt
> index 5d0f7ae..87b9a56 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/qcom_nandc.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/qcom_nandc.txt
> @@ -9,15 +9,17 @@ Required properties:
> - clock-names: must contain "core" for the core clock and "aon" for the
> always on clock
> - dmas: DMA specifier, consisting of a phandle to the ADM DMA
> - controller node and the channel number to be used for
> - NAND. Refer to dma.txt and qcom_adm.txt for more details
> -- dma-names: must be "rxtx"
> -- qcom,cmd-crci: must contain the ADM command type CRCI block instance
> - number specified for the NAND controller on the given
> - platform
> -- qcom,data-crci: must contain the ADM data type CRCI block instance
> - number specified for the NAND controller on the given
> - platform
> + or BAM DMA controller node and the channel number to
> + be used for NAND. Refer to dma.txt, qcom_adm.txt(ADM)
> + and qcom/bam_dma.txt(BAM) for more details
> +- dma-names: "rxtx" - ADM
> + "tx", "rx", "cmd" - BAM
> +- qcom,cmd-crci: Only required for ADM DMA. must contain the ADM command
> + type CRCI block instance number specified for the NAND
> + controller on the given platform.
> +- qcom,data-crci: Only required for ADM DMA. must contain the ADM data
> + type CRCI block instance number specified for the NAND
> + controller on the given platform.
> - #address-cells: <1> - subnodes give the chip-select number
> - #size-cells: <0>
>
> @@ -95,6 +97,11 @@ nand@...0000 {
> <&gcc GCC_QPIC_AHB_CLK>;
> clock-names = "core", "aon";
>
> + dmas = <&qpicbam 0>,
> + <&qpicbam 1>,
> + <&qpicbam 2>;
> + dma-names = "tx", "rx", "cmd";
> +
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/qcom_nandc.c
> index f55f728..520add9 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/qcom_nandc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/qcom_nandc.c
> @@ -226,6 +226,7 @@ struct nandc_regs {
> * by upper layers directly
> * @buf_size/count/start: markers for chip->read_buf/write_buf functions
> * @reg_read_buf: local buffer for reading back registers via DMA
> + * @reg_read_buf_phys: contains dma address for register read buffer
> * @reg_read_pos: marker for data read in reg_read_buf
> *
> * @regs: a contiguous chunk of memory for DMA register
> @@ -249,9 +250,19 @@ struct qcom_nand_controller {
> struct clk *core_clk;
> struct clk *aon_clk;
>
> - struct dma_chan *chan;
> - unsigned int cmd_crci;
> - unsigned int data_crci;
> + union {
> + struct {
> + struct dma_chan *tx_chan;
> + struct dma_chan *rx_chan;
> + struct dma_chan *cmd_chan;
> + };
> + struct {
> + struct dma_chan *chan;
> + unsigned int cmd_crci;
> + unsigned int data_crci;
> + };
> + };
> +
> struct list_head desc_list;
>
> u8 *data_buffer;
> @@ -261,6 +272,7 @@ struct qcom_nand_controller {
> int buf_start;
>
> __le32 *reg_read_buf;
> + dma_addr_t reg_read_buf_phys;
> int reg_read_pos;
>
> struct nandc_regs *regs;
> @@ -1956,16 +1968,48 @@ static int qcom_nandc_alloc(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc)
> if (!nandc->regs)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - nandc->reg_read_buf = devm_kzalloc(nandc->dev,
> - MAX_REG_RD * sizeof(*nandc->reg_read_buf),
> - GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!nandc->reg_read_buf)
> - return -ENOMEM;
>
> - nandc->chan = dma_request_slave_channel(nandc->dev, "rxtx");
> - if (!nandc->chan) {
> - dev_err(nandc->dev, "failed to request slave channel\n");
> - return -ENODEV;
> + if (!nandc->dma_bam_enabled) {
> + nandc->reg_read_buf =
> + devm_kzalloc(nandc->dev, MAX_REG_RD *
> + sizeof(*nandc->reg_read_buf), GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> + if (!nandc->reg_read_buf)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + nandc->chan = dma_request_slave_channel(nandc->dev, "rxtx");
> + if (!nandc->chan) {
> + dev_err(nandc->dev,
> + "failed to request slave channel\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> + } else {
> + nandc->reg_read_buf =
> + dmam_alloc_coherent(nandc->dev, MAX_REG_RD *
> + sizeof(*nandc->reg_read_buf),
> + &nandc->reg_read_buf_phys,
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> + if (!nandc->reg_read_buf)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + nandc->tx_chan = dma_request_slave_channel(nandc->dev, "tx");
> + if (!nandc->tx_chan) {
> + dev_err(nandc->dev, "failed to request tx channel\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + nandc->rx_chan = dma_request_slave_channel(nandc->dev, "rx");
> + if (!nandc->rx_chan) {
> + dev_err(nandc->dev, "failed to request rx channel\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + nandc->cmd_chan = dma_request_slave_channel(nandc->dev, "cmd");
> + if (!nandc->cmd_chan) {
> + dev_err(nandc->dev, "failed to request cmd channel\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> }
>
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nandc->desc_list);
> @@ -1978,7 +2022,19 @@ static int qcom_nandc_alloc(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc)
>
> static void qcom_nandc_unalloc(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc)
> {
> - dma_release_channel(nandc->chan);
> + if (nandc->dma_bam_enabled) {
> + if (nandc->tx_chan)
> + dma_release_channel(nandc->tx_chan);
> +
> + if (nandc->rx_chan)
> + dma_release_channel(nandc->rx_chan);
> +
> + if (nandc->cmd_chan)
> + dma_release_channel(nandc->cmd_chan);
> + } else {
> + if (nandc->chan)
> + dma_release_channel(nandc->chan);
> + }
> }
>
> /* one time setup of a few nand controller registers */
> @@ -2063,16 +2119,20 @@ static int qcom_nandc_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct device_node *np = nandc->dev->of_node;
> int ret;
>
> - ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "qcom,cmd-crci", &nandc->cmd_crci);
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(nandc->dev, "command CRCI unspecified\n");
> - return ret;
> - }
> + if (!nandc->dma_bam_enabled) {
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "qcom,cmd-crci",
> + &nandc->cmd_crci);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(nandc->dev, "command CRCI unspecified\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
>
> - ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "qcom,data-crci", &nandc->data_crci);
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(nandc->dev, "data CRCI unspecified\n");
> - return ret;
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "qcom,data-crci",
> + &nandc->data_crci);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(nandc->dev, "data CRCI unspecified\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> }
>
> return 0;
> @@ -2128,7 +2188,7 @@ static int qcom_nandc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> ret = qcom_nandc_alloc(nandc);
> if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + goto err_core_clk;
>
> ret = clk_prepare_enable(nandc->core_clk);
> if (ret)
>
Can you please fix your mailer to stop adding "QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf
of Qualcomm Innovation Center"... stuff at the bottom of the patches ?
--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
Powered by blists - more mailing lists