[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VfGLEXirr7sPX37rSxfpax7XYWoxWMR3moCNy7hzKRuww@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 14:43:38 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk>,
Sascha Weisenberger <sascha.weisenberger@...mens.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] serial/gpio: exar: Fixes and support for IOT2000
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Linus Walleij
<linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 10:09 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com> wrote:
>> On 2017-06-21 08:29, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> http://git.kiszka.org/?p=linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/queues/gpio-iot2000
>>
>> If you want me to resend anything, just let me know. Would be great to
>> have the remaining pieces lined up in time for the next merge window.
>
> I could just pull it in, but then I want a clear indication that Greg and
> say Andy are happy with this.
All patches that have my tag already are good from my point of view.
The rest, i.e.
"platform: Accept const properties", needs a slightly more attention.
This one on one hand does the right thing, though I would like to hear
Mika on this.
We still have platform_device_info and mfd_cell that doesn't define
the properties with const.
(I believe they should, though is it matter of this patch?)
P.S. I have looked at the current state of the use of the API in
question and rather agree with the patch, thus
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists