[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0949cae5-d010-48c6-e54d-f59a38d09600@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 14:13:55 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: LAPIC: Fix lapic timer injection delay
On 29/06/2017 14:05, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> + /* In case the sw timer triggered in the window */
> + if (!apic_lvtt_period(apic)) {
> + if (r || atomic_read(&apic->lapic_timer.pending)) {
> + need_cancel = true;
> + if (r)
> + apic_timer_expired(apic);
> + }
> + }
Yes, that's equivalent. The compiler should thread the jumps as if it were:
if (r) {
apic_timer_expired(apic);
goto cancel_timer;
}
if (atomic_read(&apic->lapic_timer.pending))
goto cancel_timer;
so it produces pretty good code too.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists