[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1fdc6985-f6ca-2751-3503-a6de67b517e0@roeck-us.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 06:41:11 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@...ic.nl>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jdelvare@...e.com,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hwmon: Add LTC2471/LTC2473 driver
On 06/29/2017 06:22 AM, Mike Looijmans wrote:
> On 29-06-17 14:30, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>> On 06/29/2017 02:13 PM, Mike Looijmans wrote:
>>> The LTC2741 and LTC2473 are single voltage monitoring chips. The LTC2473
>>> is similar to the LTC2471 but outputs a signed differential value.
>>>
>>> Datasheet:
>>> http://cds.linear.com/docs/en/datasheet/24713fb.pdf
>>
>> This looks more like a general purpose ADC rather than a specialized voltage
>> monitoring chip. In my opinion this driver would be better suited for the
>> IIO framework. But before you start working on that lets try to hear what
>> others think about this.
>
> I'm neutral on it, it's being used as a hardware monitor on the board I have, but it's indeed a generic I2C ADC.
>
> Do you have a suggestion for a similar device (simple I2C ADC) that I could base the IIO driver on? I've come across the AD799x which seems a good starting point.
>
ltc2485, ltc2497 ? No idea how close they are.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists