[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6DD002DC6D@AcuExch.aculab.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 14:28:23 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Al Cooper' <al.cooper@...adcom.com>
CC: Al Cooper <alcooperx@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
yuan linyu <Linyu.Yuan@...atel-sbell.com.cn>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"open list:USB SUBSYSTEM" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com"
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/8] usb: bdc: Small code cleanup
From: Al Cooper
> Sent: 28 June 2017 15:56
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 4:47 AM, David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> temp = bdc_readl(bdc->regs, BDC_BDCSC);
> >> if ((temp & BDC_P64) &&
> >> !dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64))) {
> >> - dev_dbg(bdc->dev, "Using 64-bit address\n");
> >> + dev_dbg(dev, "Using 64-bit address\n");
> >> } else {
> >> - ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> >> + ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> >
> > That just wrong...
> > Or was wrong before.
>
> Why is this wrong?
It isn't obvious that &pdev->dev is bdc->dev and hence dev.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists