[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170629153932.GA2924@krava>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 17:39:32 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...el.com>
Cc: "acme@...nel.org" <acme@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com"
<alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: set no branch type for dummy event in PT
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 03:31:45PM +0000, Liang, Kan wrote:
SNIP
> > > static int intel_pt_recording_options(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
> > > struct perf_evlist *evlist,
> > > struct record_opts *opts)
> > > @@ -701,6 +717,8 @@ static int intel_pt_recording_options(struct
> > auxtrace_record *itr,
> > > perf_evsel__set_sample_bit(switch_evsel,
> > TIME);
> > > perf_evsel__set_sample_bit(switch_evsel,
> > CPU);
> > >
> > > + add_no_lbr_config_term(&switch_evsel-
> > >config_terms);
> > > +
> >
> > hum, why can't you change the sample bit directly? with:
> >
> > perf_evsel__reset_sample_bit(switch_evsel,
> > BRANCH_STACK);
>
> It will be overwrite in perf_evsel__config.
>
where? you set the evsel->no_aux_samples
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists