linux-kernel - Re: [BISECTED, REGRESSION] v4.12-rc: omapdrm fails to probe on Nokia N900

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170630055227.GF3730@atomide.com>
Date:   Thu, 29 Jun 2017 22:52:27 -0700
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>
Cc:     Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
        Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [BISECTED, REGRESSION] v4.12-rc: omapdrm fails to probe on Nokia
 N900

* Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi> [170629 11:50]:
> Is it just me or do other OMAP users fail to see omapdrm changes being
> posted to linux-omap for testing or review purposes?

Yeah Cc:ing linux-omap in addition to the drm list is a good idea. Hopefully
we get few more people to review changes that way.

What also should help preventing regressions is getting the changes into
Linux next early on during the -rc cycle. And switching the defconfigs to
use omapdrm instead of omapfb. Maybe we should do that right after v4.13-rc1
is tagged.

Cheers,

Tony