| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAFqH_50_Lz-xG74LbojSps1vfosRuejQWY483c8RhiZi3XiJPA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 10:15:47 +0200
From: Enric Balletbo Serra <eballetbo@...il.com>
To: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
Sameer Nanda <snanda@...omium.org>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] thermal: core: Allow to disable polling when
disabling thermal zone.
Hi Rui,
2017-06-30 7:05 GMT+02:00 Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>:
> On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 18:50 +0200, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
>> Under each thermal zone there is a optional file called "mode".
>> Writing
>> enabled or disabled to this file allows a given thermal zone to be
>> enabled
>> or disabled, but in current code, the monitoring queue doesn't stops.
>> Add
>> the code to disable polling when disabling thermal zone and enable
>> polling
>> when enabling the thermal zone.
>>
>> This patch is based on the original Sameer Nanda <snanda@...omium.org
>> >
>> patch that implemented this idea for the ACPI thermal driver.
>>
>
> Before these two patches, only platform thermal driver cares about
> "mode", thermal core does nothing but invokes platform .set_mode()
> callback upon sysfs I/F write.
> But after this patch set, "mode" becomes something that we should
> take into account in thermal core as well.
> Thus, IMO, we have a couple of things more to do, like the prototype
> patch attached, which I have not tested yet.
>
> From 8bf51fe65bd386b7e8c3c2ca8b9f7d321c92b22f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
> Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 11:11:45 +0800
> Subject: [RFC PATCH] Thermal: introduce thermal zone device mode control
>
> Thermal "mode" sysfs attribute is introduced to enable/disable a thermal zone,
> and .get_mode()/.set_mode() callback is introduced for platform thermal driver
> to enable/disable the hardware thermal control logic. And thermal core takes
> no action upon thermal zone enable/disable.
>
> Actually, this is not quite right because thermal core still pokes those
> disabled thermal zones occasionally, e.g. upon system resume.
>
> To fix this, a new flag 'mode' is introduced in struct thermal_zone_device
> to represent the thermal zone mode, and several decisions have been made
> based on this flag, including
> 1. check the thermal zone mode right after it's registered.
> 2. skip updating thermal zone if the zone is disabled
> 3. stop the polling timer when the thermal zone is disabled
>
> Note: basically, this patch doesn't affect the existing always-enabled
> thermal zones much, with just one exception -
> thermal zone .get_mode() must be well prepared to reflect the real thermal
> zone status upon the thermal zone registration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/thermal/thermal_sysfs.c | 22 ++++++----------------
> include/linux/thermal.h | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> index 5a51c74..89b2254 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> @@ -306,9 +306,9 @@ static void monitor_thermal_zone(struct thermal_zone_device *tz)
> {
> mutex_lock(&tz->lock);
>
> - if (tz->passive)
> + if (tz->enabled == THERMAL_DEVICE_ENABLED && tz->passive)
tz->mode
> thermal_zone_device_set_polling(tz, tz->passive_delay);
> - else if (tz->polling_delay)
> + else if (tz->enabled == THERMAL_DEVICE_ENABLED && tz->polling_delay)
tz->mode
> thermal_zone_device_set_polling(tz, tz->polling_delay);
> else
> thermal_zone_device_set_polling(tz, 0);
> @@ -464,11 +464,35 @@ static void thermal_zone_device_reset(struct thermal_zone_device *tz)
> pos->initialized = false;
> }
>
> +int thermal_zone_set_mode(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
> + enum thermal_device_mode mode)
> +{
> + int result;
> +
> + if (!tz->ops->set_mode)
> + return -EPERM;
> +
> + result = tz->ops->set_mode(tz, mode);
> + if (result)
> + return result;
> +
> + if (tz->mode != mode) {
> + tz->mode = mode;
> + monitor_thermal_zone(tz);
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(thermal_zone_set_mode);
> +
> void thermal_zone_device_update(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
> enum thermal_notify_event event)
> {
> int count;
>
> + /* Do nothing if the thermal zone is disabled */
> + if (tz->mode == THERMAL_DEVICE_DISABLED)
> + return;
> +
> if (atomic_read(&in_suspend))
> return;
>
> @@ -1287,6 +1311,15 @@ thermal_zone_device_register(const char *type, int trips, int mask,
> INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&tz->poll_queue, thermal_zone_device_check);
>
> thermal_zone_device_reset(tz);
> +
> + if (tz->ops->get_mode()) {
remove the ()
> + enum thermal_device_mode mode;
> +
> + result = tz->ops->get_mode(tz, &mode);
> + tz->mode = result ? THERMAL_DEVICE_ENABLED : mode;
> + } else
> + tz->mode = THERMAL_DEVICE_ENABLED;
> +
> /* Update the new thermal zone and mark it as already updated. */
> if (atomic_cmpxchg(&tz->need_update, 1, 0))
> thermal_zone_device_update(tz, THERMAL_EVENT_UNSPECIFIED);
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_sysfs.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_sysfs.c
> index a694de9..95d2587 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_sysfs.c
> @@ -51,17 +51,8 @@ static ssize_t
> mode_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> {
> struct thermal_zone_device *tz = to_thermal_zone(dev);
> - enum thermal_device_mode mode;
> - int result;
> -
> - if (!tz->ops->get_mode)
> - return -EPERM;
>
> - result = tz->ops->get_mode(tz, &mode);
> - if (result)
> - return result;
> -
> - return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", mode == THERMAL_DEVICE_ENABLED ? "enabled"
> + return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", tz->mode == THERMAL_DEVICE_ENABLED ? "enabled"
> : "disabled");
> }
>
> @@ -70,18 +61,17 @@ mode_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> const char *buf, size_t count)
> {
> struct thermal_zone_device *tz = to_thermal_zone(dev);
> + enum thermal_device_mode mode;
> int result;
>
> - if (!tz->ops->set_mode)
> - return -EPERM;
> -
> if (!strncmp(buf, "enabled", sizeof("enabled") - 1))
> - result = tz->ops->set_mode(tz, THERMAL_DEVICE_ENABLED);
> + mode = THERMAL_DEVICE_ENABLED;
> else if (!strncmp(buf, "disabled", sizeof("disabled") - 1))
> - result = tz->ops->set_mode(tz, THERMAL_DEVICE_DISABLED);
> + mode = THERMAL_DEVICE_DISABLED;
> else
> - result = -EINVAL;
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> + result = thermal_zone_set_mode(tz, mode)
> if (result)
> return result;
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/thermal.h b/include/linux/thermal.h
> index dab11f9..2f427de 100644
> --- a/include/linux/thermal.h
> +++ b/include/linux/thermal.h
> @@ -210,6 +210,7 @@ struct thermal_zone_device {
> struct thermal_attr *trip_type_attrs;
> struct thermal_attr *trip_hyst_attrs;
> void *devdata;
> + enum thermal_device_mode mode;
> int trips;
> unsigned long trips_disabled; /* bitmap for disabled trips */
> int passive_delay;
> @@ -465,6 +466,8 @@ struct thermal_zone_device *thermal_zone_get_zone_by_name(const char *name);
> int thermal_zone_get_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int *temp);
> int thermal_zone_get_slope(struct thermal_zone_device *tz);
> int thermal_zone_get_offset(struct thermal_zone_device *tz);
> +int thermal_zone_set_mode(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
> + enum thermal_device_mode mode);
>
> int get_tz_trend(struct thermal_zone_device *, int);
> struct thermal_instance *get_thermal_instance(struct thermal_zone_device *,
> --
> 2.7.4
>
There are some build issues but once fixed the patch works as
expected, many thanks.
Tested-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
Rui, do you want I send a fixed version of this patch? Or do you want
to fix yourself?
Best regards,
Enric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists