lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d104f09f-418b-0664-d7d4-013d8172df17@intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 30 Jun 2017 11:51:22 +0300
From:   Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 25/37] perf script: Add synthesized Intel PT power and
 ptwrite events

On 06/30/2017 05:08 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 05:13:54PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
>> Em Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:56:25PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
>>> On 06/28/2017 11:26 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>>>> Right, and I've not been able to focus on this, but I think the problem
>>>> is with packed mixed with unnamed unions :-\
>  
>>> Another possibility is to avoid packed altogether e.g.
> 
>> This one builds on centos:6, now running the full set of containers,
>> will let you know the results.
> 
> Ok, passes all tests (gcc, clang where available) on:
> 
> 
>   # dm
>    1 alpine:3.4: Ok
>    2 alpine:3.5: Ok
>    3 alpine:3.6: Ok
>    4 alpine:edge: Ok
>    5 android-ndk:r12b-arm: Ok
>    6 archlinux:latest: Ok
>    7 centos:5: Ok
>    8 centos:6: Ok
>    9 centos:7: Ok
>   10 debian:7: Ok
>   11 debian:8: Ok
>   12 debian:9: Ok
>   13 debian:experimental: Ok
>   14 debian:experimental-x-arm64: Ok
>   15 debian:experimental-x-mips: Ok
>   16 debian:experimental-x-mips64: Ok
>   17 debian:experimental-x-mipsel: Ok
>   18 fedora:20: Ok
>   19 fedora:21: Ok
>   20 fedora:22: Ok
>   21 fedora:23: Ok
>   22 fedora:24: Ok
>   23 fedora:24-x-ARC-uClibc: Ok
>   24 fedora:25: Ok
>   25 fedora:rawhide: Ok
>   26 mageia:5: Ok
>   27 opensuse:13.2: Ok
>   28 opensuse:42.1: Ok
>   29 opensuse:tumbleweed: Ok
>   30 ubuntu:12.04.5: Ok
>   31 ubuntu:14.04.4: Ok
>   32 ubuntu:14.04.4-x-linaro-arm64: Ok
>   33 ubuntu:15.10: Ok
>   34 ubuntu:16.04: Ok
>   35 ubuntu:16.04-x-arm: Ok
>   36 ubuntu:16.04-x-arm64: Ok
>   37 ubuntu:16.04-x-powerpc: Ok
>   38 ubuntu:16.04-x-powerpc64: Ok
>   39 ubuntu:16.04-x-powerpc64el: Ok
>   40 ubuntu:16.04-x-s390: Ok
>   41 ubuntu:16.10: Ok
>   42 ubuntu:17.04: Ok
>   #
> 
> Can you provide new versions for the relevant patches?

I have sent new versions of the 2 patches affected.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ