[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <635775cb-fc4f-370c-297b-f12cd5d3f4ce@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 15:57:13 +0300
From: Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net, khilman@...libre.com,
mturquette@...libre.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, skannan@...eaurora.org,
sboyd@...eaurora.org, andy.gross@...aro.org,
seansw@....qualcomm.com, davidai@...cinc.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] dt-bindings: Interconnect device-tree bindings
draft
Hi Rob,
On 06/30/2017 12:32 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 08:49:03PM +0300, Georgi Djakov wrote:
>> The interconnect API is not yet using DT bindings for expressing
>> the relations between the API consumers and providers. This is
>> posted a separate patch as it needs further discussions on how
>> to represent this with DT.
>
> I would recommend continuing to sort out how this works within the
> kernel before fixing things in DT. Something like this needs to be a
> core binding in the DT spec.
Yes, that's the plan. Do you prefer me to drop this patch for now?
>
> Also, you should CC some ARM, Ltd. folks like Mark R and Lorenzo.
> There's been some discussion in the past how to describe the DMA master
> side of the bus topology.
Thanks for the information! I will CC them on the next version!
BR,
Georgi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists