[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170630141656.1626-1-kan.liang@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 10:16:55 -0400
From: kan.liang@...el.com
To: acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, ak@...ux.intel.com,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2 1/2] perf tools: set no_aux_samples for the tracking event in PT
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
The reason of introducing the tracking event (a dummy software event) is
to collect side-band information. Additional sampling is wasteful.
no_aux_samples should be set for tracking event.
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
---
Changes since V1
- new patch to set no_aux_samples for the tracking event (jirka)
tools/perf/arch/x86/util/intel-pt.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/intel-pt.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/intel-pt.c
index f630de0..4fe1aed 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/intel-pt.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/intel-pt.c
@@ -751,6 +751,7 @@ static int intel_pt_recording_options(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
tracking_evsel->attr.freq = 0;
tracking_evsel->attr.sample_period = 1;
+ tracking_evsel->no_aux_samples = true;
if (need_immediate)
tracking_evsel->immediate = true;
--
2.9.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists