linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm/zsmalloc: simplify zs_max_alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170630012436.GA24520@bbox>
Date:   Fri, 30 Jun 2017 10:24:36 +0900
From:   Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To:     Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>
Cc:     Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
        Mahendran Ganesh <opensource.ganesh@...il.com>,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/zsmalloc: simplify zs_max_alloc_size handling

Hi Jerome,

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 10:14:20AM +0200, Jerome Marchand wrote:
> Commit 40f9fb8cffc6 ("mm/zsmalloc: support allocating obj with size of
> ZS_MAX_ALLOC_SIZE") fixes a size calculation error that prevented
> zsmalloc to allocate an object of the maximal size
> (ZS_MAX_ALLOC_SIZE). I think however the fix is unneededly
> complicated.
> 
> This patch replaces the dynamic calculation of zs_size_classes at init
> time by a compile time calculation that uses the DIV_ROUND_UP() macro
> already used in get_size_class_index().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>
> ---
>  mm/zsmalloc.c | 52 +++++++++++++++-------------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/zsmalloc.c b/mm/zsmalloc.c
> index d41edd2..134024b 100644
> --- a/mm/zsmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/zsmalloc.c
> @@ -116,6 +116,11 @@
>  #define OBJ_INDEX_BITS	(BITS_PER_LONG - _PFN_BITS - OBJ_TAG_BITS)
>  #define OBJ_INDEX_MASK	((_AC(1, UL) << OBJ_INDEX_BITS) - 1)
>  
> +#define FULLNESS_BITS	2
> +#define CLASS_BITS	8
> +#define ISOLATED_BITS	3
> +#define MAGIC_VAL_BITS	8
> +
>  #define MAX(a, b) ((a) >= (b) ? (a) : (b))
>  /* ZS_MIN_ALLOC_SIZE must be multiple of ZS_ALIGN */
>  #define ZS_MIN_ALLOC_SIZE \
> @@ -137,6 +142,8 @@
>   *  (reason above)
>   */
>  #define ZS_SIZE_CLASS_DELTA	(PAGE_SIZE >> CLASS_BITS)
> +#define ZS_SIZE_CLASSES	DIV_ROUND_UP(ZS_MAX_ALLOC_SIZE - ZS_MIN_ALLOC_SIZE, \
> +				     ZS_SIZE_CLASS_DELTA)

#define ZS_SIZE_CLASSES	(DIV_ROUND_UP(ZS_MAX_ALLOC_SIZE - ZS_MIN_ALLOC_SIZE, \
				     ZS_SIZE_CLASS_DELTA) + 1)


I think it should add +1 to cover ZS_MIN_ALLOC_SIZE.
Otherwise, looks good to me.

Thanks.