[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VfWmAvaASLZOhmMBW7v+E10_7xvD11OSMKdQ0HbY_yHVg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 20:40:15 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net>,
Stephen Just <stephenjust@...il.com>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
devel@...ica.org,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI: surface3_power: MSHW0011 rev-eng implementation
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 30-06-17 18:37, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 6:57 PM, Benjamin Tissoires
> ACPI i2c drivers still need an empty i2c_device_id table I've
> fixing this on my TODO but it has been buried in other stuff.
>
> Benjamin if (not saying you should, but if) you want to take a look at
> this, fixing the need for the empty table for ACPI devices should be
> easy. The problem is these lines in drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c:
> i2c_device_probe():
>
> /*
> * An I2C ID table is not mandatory, if and only if, a suitable
> Device
> * Tree match table entry is supplied for the probing device.
> */
> if (!driver->id_table &&
> !i2c_of_match_device(dev->driver->of_match_table, client))
> return -ENODEV;
>
> Which needs to be extended to also check for an ACPI match AFAIK
> you can NOT just replace this with i2c_device_match because that would
> break manually binding a driver through sysfs.
I have a stashed change for that, just have no time to look closer.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists