[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1498844519-8845-5-git-send-email-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 11:41:58 -0600
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] coresight: etb10: Move etb_disable_hw() outside of lock
Function etb_disable_hw() is already taking care of unlocking and locking
the coresight access register and as such doesn't need to be placed
within the unlock/lock of function etb_update_buffer().
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
---
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etb10.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etb10.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etb10.c
index 42360306f049..d0d186575c5d 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etb10.c
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etb10.c
@@ -376,8 +376,8 @@ static void etb_update_buffer(struct coresight_device *csdev,
capacity = drvdata->buffer_depth * ETB_FRAME_SIZE_WORDS;
- CS_UNLOCK(drvdata->base);
etb_disable_hw(drvdata);
+ CS_UNLOCK(drvdata->base);
/* unit is in words, not bytes */
read_ptr = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + ETB_RAM_READ_POINTER);
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists