[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1498780894-8253-22-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 17:01:30 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
oleg@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...hat.com,
dave@...olabs.net, manfred@...orfullife.com, tj@...nel.org,
arnd@...db.de, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, will.deacon@....com,
peterz@...radead.org, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
parri.andrea@...il.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
<linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH RFC 22/26] s390: Remove spin_unlock_wait() arch-specific definitions
There is no agreed-upon definition of spin_unlock_wait()'s semantics,
and it appears that all callers could do just as well with a lock/unlock
pair. This commit therefore removes the underlying arch-specific
arch_spin_unlock_wait().
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Cc: <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
---
arch/s390/include/asm/spinlock.h | 7 -------
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/spinlock.h
index f7838ecd83c6..217ee5210c32 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/spinlock.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/spinlock.h
@@ -98,13 +98,6 @@ static inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lp)
: "cc", "memory");
}
-static inline void arch_spin_unlock_wait(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
- while (arch_spin_is_locked(lock))
- arch_spin_relax(lock);
- smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep();
-}
-
/*
* Read-write spinlocks, allowing multiple readers
* but only one writer.
--
2.5.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists