[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <34f4ec54-6647-8b04-4c09-3b2fa16010e9@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 14:08:02 -0700
From: sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy Natarajan <sathyaosid@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Whiskey Cove PMIC GPIO
driver
Hi Andy,
On 06/30/2017 01:51 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> If we are going to rename (which I personally consider as a good
> idea), this should follow it, and not otherwise.
I am having second thoughts about the rename. After going through the
spec documents, I found that there are two main differences between CHT
and BXT PMIC GPIO controllers.
1. BXT variant has 3 GPIO banks where as CHT variant has only 2 GPIO banks.
2. GPIO I/O control register and IRQ register mapping addresses are
different in both BXT and CHT variants.
Given above differences, I think we have a choice to use the current
driver and pass the above data difference to driver via .driver_data or
platform_data. This is a bit messy method because we are not getting the
register address or info about number of gpio banks from BIOS.
Other solution is to rename the existing driver to gpio-bxt-wcove.c and
create a new one for CHT (if required).
Let me know your comments.
--
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux kernel developer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists