[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170701180129.GA17405@beast>
Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2017 11:01:29 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] locking/refcounts: Remove refcount_sub() extern
CONFIG_REFCOUNT_FULL (correctly) did not provide a refcount_sub(), which
should not be part of proper refcount design patterns. This removes the
erroneous extern (and the later non-FULL accidental implementation).
Fixes: 29dee3c03abc ("locking/refcounts: Out-of-line everything")
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
---
This should be applied to locking/core for -next, please.
---
include/linux/refcount.h | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/refcount.h b/include/linux/refcount.h
index 099c32bd07b2..c31579bcf1fe 100644
--- a/include/linux/refcount.h
+++ b/include/linux/refcount.h
@@ -49,7 +49,6 @@ extern __must_check bool refcount_inc_not_zero(refcount_t *r);
extern void refcount_inc(refcount_t *r);
extern __must_check bool refcount_sub_and_test(unsigned int i, refcount_t *r);
-extern void refcount_sub(unsigned int i, refcount_t *r);
extern __must_check bool refcount_dec_and_test(refcount_t *r);
extern void refcount_dec(refcount_t *r);
@@ -81,11 +80,6 @@ static inline __must_check bool refcount_sub_and_test(unsigned int i,
return atomic_sub_and_test(i, &r->refs);
}
-static inline void refcount_sub(unsigned int i, refcount_t *r)
-{
- atomic_sub(i, &r->refs);
-}
-
static inline __must_check bool refcount_dec_and_test(refcount_t *r)
{
return atomic_dec_and_test(&r->refs);
--
2.7.4
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists