lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170703113732.6af8235d@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Mon, 3 Jul 2017 11:37:32 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the arm64 tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:

  arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c

between commit:

  425e1ed73e65 ("arm64: fix endianness annotation for 'struct jit_ctx' and friends")

from the arm64 tree and commit:

  f1c9eed7f437 ("bpf, arm64: take advantage of stack_depth tracking")

from the net-next tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 8860bb9c33a1,2f0505b5c240..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@@ -70,7 -70,8 +70,8 @@@ struct jit_ctx 
  	int idx;
  	int epilogue_offset;
  	int *offset;
 -	u32 *image;
 +	__le32 *image;
+ 	u32 stack_size;
  };
  
  static inline void emit(const u32 insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ