linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/14] qcom: mtd: nand: allocate bam transaction

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 3 Jul 2017 13:52:03 +0530
From:   Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>
To:     Abhishek Sahu <absahu@...eaurora.org>, dwmw2@...radead.org,
        computersforpeace@...il.com, boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com,
        marek.vasut@...il.com, richard@....at, cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com
Cc:     linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        andy.gross@...aro.org, architt@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/14] qcom: mtd: nand: allocate bam transaction

Hi Abhishek,

<..>

> +/* Allocates and Initializes the BAM transaction */
> +static struct bam_transaction *
> +alloc_bam_transaction(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc, unsigned int num_cw)
> +{
> +	struct bam_transaction *bam_txn;
> +
> +	bam_txn = devm_kzalloc(nandc->dev, sizeof(*bam_txn), GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> +	if (!bam_txn)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	bam_txn->bam_ce =
> +		devm_kzalloc(nandc->dev, sizeof(*bam_txn->bam_ce) *
> +			     num_cw * QPIC_PER_CW_MAX_CMD_ELEMENTS, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!bam_txn->bam_ce)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	bam_txn->cmd_sgl =
> +		devm_kzalloc(nandc->dev, sizeof(*bam_txn->cmd_sgl) * num_cw *
> +			     QPIC_PER_CW_MAX_CMD_SGL, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!bam_txn->cmd_sgl)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	bam_txn->data_sg =
> +		devm_kzalloc(nandc->dev, sizeof(*bam_txn->data_sg) *
> +			     num_cw * QPIC_PER_CW_MAX_DATA_SGL, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!bam_txn->data_sg)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	nandc->max_cwperpage = num_cw;
> +
> +	return bam_txn;
> +}
> +
>  static inline struct qcom_nand_host *to_qcom_nand_host(struct nand_chip *chip)
>  {
>  	return container_of(chip, struct qcom_nand_host, chip);
> @@ -1868,6 +1958,8 @@ static int qcom_nand_host_setup(struct qcom_nand_host *host)
>  	mtd_set_ooblayout(mtd, &qcom_nand_ooblayout_ops);
>  
>  	cwperpage = mtd->writesize / ecc->size;
> +	nandc->max_cwperpage = max_t(unsigned int, nandc->max_cwperpage,
> +					cwperpage);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * DATA_UD_BYTES varies based on whether the read/write command protects
> @@ -2010,6 +2102,19 @@ static int qcom_nandc_alloc(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc)
>  			dev_err(nandc->dev, "failed to request cmd channel\n");
>  			return -ENODEV;
>  		}
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Initially allocate BAM transaction to read ONFI param page.
> +		 * After detecting all the devices, this BAM transaction will
> +		 * be freed and the next BAM tranasction will be allocated with
> +		 * maximum codeword size
> +		 */
> +		nandc->bam_txn = alloc_bam_transaction(nandc, 1);
> +		if (!nandc->bam_txn) {
> +			dev_err(nandc->dev,
> +				"failed to allocate bam transaction\n");
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nandc->desc_list);
> @@ -2153,6 +2258,17 @@ static int qcom_probe_nand_devices(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc)
>  	if (list_empty(&nandc->host_list))
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
> +	if (nandc->dma_bam_enabled) {
> +		free_bam_transaction(nandc);
> +		nandc->bam_txn = alloc_bam_transaction(nandc,
> +						       nandc->max_cwperpage);

 Somehow, looks like something is missing because, nandc->max_cwperpage passed from
 here is used in alloc_bam_transaction, but it is assigned in the same function ?

Regards,
 Sricharan

-- 
"QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus