[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABawtvOHnQ12WvSNDn2gZRLAqLjAXUGXc8PObtdU5uBS6rpe_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 09:55:07 +0800
From: Ethan Zhao <ethan.kernel@...il.com>
To: James Puthukattukaran <james.puthukattukaran@...cle.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] PCI: Workaround wrong flags completions for IDT switch
James,
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 5:42 AM, James Puthukattukaran
<james.puthukattukaran@...cle.com> wrote:
> From: James Puthukattukaran <james.puthukattukaran@...cle.com>
>
> The IDT switch incorrectly flags an ACS source violation on a read config
> request to an end point device on the completion (IDT 89H32H8G3-YC,
> errata #36) even though the PCI Express spec states that completions are
> never affected by ACS source violation (PCI Spec 3.1, Section 6.12.1.1).
>
> The suggested workaround by IDT is to issue a configuration write to the
> downstream device before issuing the first config read. This allows the
> downstream device to capture its bus number, thus avoiding the ACS
> violation on the completion.
>
> The patch does the following -
>
> 1. Disable ACS source violation if enabled
> 2. Wait for config space access to become available by reading vendor id
> 3. Do a config write to the end point (errata workaround)
> 4. Enable ACS source validation (if it was enabled to begin with)
>
> -v2: move workaround to pci_bus_read_dev_vendor_id() from
> pci_bus_check_dev()
> and move enable_acs_sv to drivers/pci/pci.c -- by Yinghai
> -v3: add bus->self check for root bus and virtual bus for sriov vfs.
> -v4: only do workaround for IDT switches
>
> Signed-off-by: James Puthukattukaran <james.puthukattukaran@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
>
> --
>
> drivers/pci/pci.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/pci/pci.h | 1 +
> drivers/pci/probe.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> index 563901c..a7a2e2b 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -2835,6 +2835,39 @@ static bool pci_acs_flags_enabled(struct pci_dev
> *pdev, u16 acs_flags)
> }
>
> /**
> + * pci_std_enable_acs_sv - enable/disable ACS source validation if
> supported by the switch
> + * @dev - pcie switch/RP
> + * @enable - enable (1) or disable (0) source validation
> + *
> + * Returns : < 0 on failure
You didn't define the meaning of 0 and >0, but you check it later against >0,
Then what does it mean 0 and >0 ?
> + * previous acs_sv state
> + */
> +int pci_std_enable_acs_sv(struct pci_dev *dev, bool enable)
> +{
> + int pos;
> + u16 cap;
> + u16 ctrl;
> + int retval;
> +
> + pos = pci_find_ext_capability(dev, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_ACS);
> + if (!pos)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_ACS_CAP, &cap);
> + pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_ACS_CTRL, &ctrl);
> +
> + retval = !!(ctrl & cap & PCI_ACS_SV);
If the device's ACS SV( ACS Source Validation) capability wasn't
implemented, the return value of this function will still tell us the
operation of enabling is successful ? though it might be rare case.
Thanks,
Ethan
> + if (enable)
> + ctrl |= (cap & PCI_ACS_SV);
> + else
> + ctrl &= ~(cap & PCI_ACS_SV);
> +
> + pci_write_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_ACS_CTRL, ctrl);
> +
> + return retval;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> * pci_acs_enabled - test ACS against required flags for a given device
> * @pdev: device to test
> * @acs_flags: required PCI ACS flags
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
> index f8113e5..3960c2a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
> @@ -343,6 +343,7 @@ static inline resource_size_t
> pci_resource_alignment(struct pci_dev *dev,
> }
>
> void pci_enable_acs(struct pci_dev *dev);
> +int pci_std_enable_acs_sv(struct pci_dev *dev, bool enable);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PCIE_PTM
> void pci_ptm_init(struct pci_dev *dev);
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> index 19c8950..c154a90 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -1763,8 +1763,8 @@ struct pci_dev *pci_alloc_dev(struct pci_bus *bus)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_alloc_dev);
>
> -bool pci_bus_read_dev_vendor_id(struct pci_bus *bus, int devfn, u32 *l,
> - int crs_timeout)
> +static bool __pci_bus_read_dev_vendor_id(struct pci_bus *bus, int devfn,
> + u32 *l, int crs_timeout)
> {
> int delay = 1;
>
> @@ -1801,6 +1801,40 @@ bool pci_bus_read_dev_vendor_id(struct pci_bus *bus,
> int devfn, u32 *l,
>
> return true;
> }
> +
> +bool pci_bus_read_dev_vendor_id(struct pci_bus *bus, int devfn, u32 *l,
> + int crs_timeout)
> +{
> + int found;
> + int enable = -1;
> + int idt_workaround = (bus->self && (bus->self->vendor ==
> PCI_VENDOR_ID_IDT));
> + /*
> + * Some IDT switches flag an ACS violation for config reads
> + * even though the PCI spec allows for it (PCIe 3.1, 6.1.12.1)
> + * It flags it because the bus number is not properly set in the
> + * completion. The workaround is to do a dummy write to properly
> + * latch number once the device is ready for config operations
> + */
> +
> + if (idt_workaround)
> + enable = pci_std_enable_acs_sv(bus->self, false);
> +
> + found = __pci_bus_read_dev_vendor_id(bus, devfn, l, crs_timeout);
> +
> + /*
> + * The fact that we can read the vendor id indicates that the device
> + * is ready for config operations. Do the write as part of the
> errata
> + * workaround.
> + */
> + if (idt_workaround) {
> + if (found)
> + pci_bus_write_config_word(bus, devfn, PCI_VENDOR_ID,
> 0);
> + if (enable > 0)
> + pci_std_enable_acs_sv(bus->self, enable);
> + }
> +
> + return found;
> +}
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_bus_read_dev_vendor_id);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists