[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170703090630.z77wxaaxkl7ngjg2@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 11:06:31 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [GIT PULL] x86/debug change for v4.13
Linus,
Please pull the latest x86-debug-for-linus git tree from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git x86-debug-for-linus
# HEAD: c133c7615751008f6c32ccae7cdfc5ff6e989c35 x86/nmi: Fix timeout test in test_nmi_ipi()
A single fix for an off-by one bug in test_nmi_ipi() that probably doesn't matter
in practice.
Thanks,
Ingo
------------------>
Dan Carpenter (1):
x86/nmi: Fix timeout test in test_nmi_ipi()
arch/x86/kernel/nmi_selftest.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/nmi_selftest.c b/arch/x86/kernel/nmi_selftest.c
index 6d9582ec0324..d27f8d84c4ff 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/nmi_selftest.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/nmi_selftest.c
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static void __init test_nmi_ipi(struct cpumask *mask)
/* Don't wait longer than a second */
timeout = USEC_PER_SEC;
- while (!cpumask_empty(mask) && timeout--)
+ while (!cpumask_empty(mask) && --timeout)
udelay(1);
/* What happens if we timeout, do we still unregister?? */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists