linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] iopoll: Avoid namespace collision within macros & tidyup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <KL1PR0601MB203830EA67621CA20520B03FC3D60@KL1PR0601MB2038.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Mon, 3 Jul 2017 09:55:55 +0000
From:   Ramesh Shanmugasundaram <ramesh.shanmugasundaram@...renesas.com>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
CC:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
        "mattw@...eaurora.org" <mattw@...eaurora.org>,
        Mitchel Humpherys <mitchelh@...eaurora.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@...esas.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] iopoll: Avoid namespace collision within macros &
 tidyup

Hi Geert,

Thanks for the review. Replying to the thread to update what we discussed in IRC sometime back.

> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Ramesh Shanmugasundaram
> <ramesh.shanmugasundaram@...renesas.com> wrote:
> > Renamed variable "timeout" to "__timeout" to avoid namespace collision.
> > Tidy up macro arguments with paranthesis.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ramesh Shanmugasundaram
> > <ramesh.shanmugasundaram@...renesas.com>
> 
> Thanks for your patches!
> 
> > --- a/include/linux/iopoll.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/iopoll.h
> > @@ -42,18 +42,19 @@
> >   */
> >  #define readx_poll_timeout(op, addr, val, cond, sleep_us, timeout_us)
> > \  ({ \
> > -       ktime_t timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), timeout_us); \
> > +       ktime_t __timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), timeout_us); \
> 
> I think timeout_us should be within parentheses, too.

It is not required as it is passed as an function (ktime_add_us) argument.

> 
> >         might_sleep_if(sleep_us); \
> >         for (;;) { \
> >                 (val) = op(addr); \
> >                 if (cond) \
> >                         break; \
> > -               if (timeout_us && ktime_compare(ktime_get(), timeout) >
> 0) { \
> > +               if ((timeout_us) && \
> > +                   ktime_compare(ktime_get(), __timeout) > 0) { \
> >                         (val) = op(addr); \
> >                         break; \
> >                 } \
> >                 if (sleep_us) \
> > -                       usleep_range((sleep_us >> 2) + 1, sleep_us); \
> > +                       usleep_range(((sleep_us) >> 2) + 1, sleep_us);
> > + \
> 
> Same for sleep_us.
> 
> Also in readx_poll_timeout_atomic(), and in your second patch.

Same as the above comment.

Thanks,
Ramesh