[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1499081214.9885.15.camel@perches.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 04:26:54 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
broonie@...nel.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org, gnurou@...il.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, jason@...edaemon.net,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/17] mfd: madera: Add register definitions for
Cirrus Logic Madera codecs
On Mon, 2017-07-03 at 12:21 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Jul 2017, Joe Perches wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2017-07-03 at 11:33 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Fri, 02 Jun 2017, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> > >
> > > > This patch adds a header file of register definitions for Cirrus
> > > > Logic "Madera" class codecs. These codecs are all based off a common
> > > > set of hardware IP so have a common register map (with a few minor
> > > > device-to-device variations). These are complex devices with a large
> > > > number of features and so have a correspondingly large register set.
> > > > The registers.h file has been auto-generated from the hardware register
> > > > definitions, stripped down to only registers we need to access from
> > > > the driver
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > Changes since V2:
> > > > - Used new field names for IRQ1_STATUS_33 register
> > > >
> > > > MAINTAINERS | 10 +
> > > > include/linux/mfd/madera/registers.h | 8832 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > 2 files changed, 8842 insertions(+)
> > > > create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/madera/registers.h
> > >
> > > Applied, thanks.
> >
> > followed by 400k of useless quoted reply!!!
> >
> > Lee. Seriously. Don't be impolite to others.
> > Remember to trim your replies.
>
> "Applied, thanks" is *obviously* the last message in my reply. Did
> you waste any time reading past that, or are you just being pedantic?
Nope, I just looked at the size and the delay
in loading this message over my phone's hotspot.
> If you are truly concerned over 400k of bandwidth you need to switch
> to a new internet provider.
Not everyone uses continuously fast connections.
> This isn't the 1980s.
2017 last I checked.
Being thoughtful to others is still something you
seem content to overlook.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists