[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170703125245.GA24159@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 14:52:45 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
Cc: Kazuya Mizuguchi <kazuya.mizuguchi.ks@...esas.com>,
Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 35/46] ravb: unmap descriptors when freeing rings
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 02:58:09PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 19:52 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > ------------------
> >
> > From: Kazuya Mizuguchi <kazuya.mizuguchi.ks@...esas.com>
> >
> >
> > [ Upstream commit a47b70ea86bdeb3091341f5ae3ef580f1a1ad822 ]
> >
> > "swiotlb buffer is full" errors occur after repeated initialisation of a
> > device - f.e. suspend/resume or ip link set up/down. This is because memory
> > mapped using dma_map_single() in ravb_ring_format() and ravb_start_xmit()
> > is not released. Resolve this problem by unmapping descriptors when
> > freeing rings.
>
> This should be followed by:
>
> commit 79514ef670e9e575a1fe36922268c439d0f0ca8a
> Author: Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@...adit-jv.com>
> Date: Tue Jun 6 00:08:10 2017 +0200
>
> ravb: Fix use-after-free on `ifconfig eth0 down`
Thanks, now queued up.
> But also, this loop looks wrong:
>
> [...]
> > if (priv->rx_ring[q]) {
> > + for (i = 0; i < priv->num_rx_ring[q]; i++) {
> > + struct ravb_ex_rx_desc *desc = &priv->rx_ring[q][i];
> > +
> > + if (!dma_mapping_error(ndev->dev.parent,
> > + le32_to_cpu(desc->dptr)))
> > + dma_unmap_single(ndev->dev.parent,
> > + le32_to_cpu(desc->dptr),
> > + PKT_BUF_SZ,
> > + DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> > + }
> [...]
>
> It's possible that the driver hasn't filled (or attempted to fill or
> refill) every RX descriptor, so this could result in a double-unmap. I
> think this needs to use cur_rx and dirty_rx to determine which
> descriptors to process.
I'll let Kazuya fix that :)
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists