[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170703133406.102280240@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 15:35:28 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 4.11 48/84] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix wrong box pointer check
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
commit 80c65fdb4c6920e332a9781a3de5877594b07522 upstream.
Should not init a NULL box. It will cause system crash.
The issue looks like caused by a typo.
This was not noticed because there is no NULL box. Also, for most
boxes, they are enabled by default. The init code is not critical.
Fixes: fff4b87e594a ("perf/x86/intel/uncore: Make package handling more robust")
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170629190926.2456-1-kan.liang@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
@@ -1170,7 +1170,7 @@ static int uncore_event_cpu_online(unsig
pmu = type->pmus;
for (i = 0; i < type->num_boxes; i++, pmu++) {
box = pmu->boxes[pkg];
- if (!box && atomic_inc_return(&box->refcnt) == 1)
+ if (box && atomic_inc_return(&box->refcnt) == 1)
uncore_box_init(box);
}
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists