[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170703133416.907292373@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 15:33:57 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 057/172] net: phy: use boolean dt properties for eee broken modes
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: jbrunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
[ Upstream commit 57f3986231bb2c69a55ccab1d2b30a00818027ac ]
The patches regarding eee-broken-modes was merged before all people
involved could find an agreement on the best way to move forward.
While we agreed on having a DT property to mark particular modes as broken,
the value used for eee-broken-modes mapped the phy register in very direct
way. Because of this, the concern is that it could be used to implement
configuration policies instead of describing a broken HW.
In the end, having a boolean property for each mode seems to be preferred
over one bit field value mapping the register (too) directly.
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
@@ -1633,7 +1633,7 @@ static void of_set_phy_supported(struct
static void of_set_phy_eee_broken(struct phy_device *phydev)
{
struct device_node *node = phydev->mdio.dev.of_node;
- u32 broken;
+ u32 broken = 0;
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_MDIO))
return;
@@ -1641,8 +1641,20 @@ static void of_set_phy_eee_broken(struct
if (!node)
return;
- if (!of_property_read_u32(node, "eee-broken-modes", &broken))
- phydev->eee_broken_modes = broken;
+ if (of_property_read_bool(node, "eee-broken-100tx"))
+ broken |= MDIO_EEE_100TX;
+ if (of_property_read_bool(node, "eee-broken-1000t"))
+ broken |= MDIO_EEE_1000T;
+ if (of_property_read_bool(node, "eee-broken-10gt"))
+ broken |= MDIO_EEE_10GT;
+ if (of_property_read_bool(node, "eee-broken-1000kx"))
+ broken |= MDIO_EEE_1000KX;
+ if (of_property_read_bool(node, "eee-broken-10gkx4"))
+ broken |= MDIO_EEE_10GKX4;
+ if (of_property_read_bool(node, "eee-broken-10gkr"))
+ broken |= MDIO_EEE_10GKR;
+
+ phydev->eee_broken_modes = broken;
}
/**
Powered by blists - more mailing lists