[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170703062152.GC13523@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 08:21:52 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Lynn Lei <lynnl.wit@...il.com>
Cc: sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, teddy.wang@...iconmotion.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: sm750fb: refactor the clock frequency
calculation method
On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 08:24:26PM +0800, Lynn Lei wrote:
> speed up calculation by merging two divisions into one.
How much did you speed it up? Please provide proof of anything like
this if you say it is a speed up.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lynn Lei <lynnl.wit@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_chip.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_chip.c b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_chip.c
> index c51761221131..5970c3792f27 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_chip.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_chip.c
> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ static unsigned int get_mxclk_freq(void)
> OD = (pll_reg & PLL_CTRL_OD_MASK) >> PLL_CTRL_OD_SHIFT;
> POD = (pll_reg & PLL_CTRL_POD_MASK) >> PLL_CTRL_POD_SHIFT;
>
> - return DEFAULT_INPUT_CLOCK * M / N / (1 << OD) / (1 << POD);
> + return DEFAULT_INPUT_CLOCK * M / N / (1 << (OD + POD));
Are you sure that gcc didn't already do this for you? It's a constant
number, I doubt this did anything at all.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists