linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] USB/PHY patches for 4.13-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170704112733.7e19d4c4@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Tue, 4 Jul 2017 11:27:33 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] USB/PHY patches for 4.13-rc1

Hi all,

On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 16:58:47 +0200 Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> All of these have been in linux-next for a while with no reported
> issues.

I have been carrying the following merge fix patch for the merge
against the uuid tree (now in Linus' tree):

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 14:36:10 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] usb: typec: fix for "ACPI: Switch to use generic guid_t in
 acpi_evaluate_dsm()"

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
---
 drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_acpi.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_acpi.c b/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_acpi.c
index 3fb2e48e1c91..7b7c9373a9b6 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_acpi.c
@@ -23,14 +23,14 @@ struct ucsi_acpi {
 	struct device *dev;
 	struct ucsi *ucsi;
 	struct ucsi_ppm ppm;
-	uuid_le uuid;
+	guid_t uuid;
 };
 
 static int ucsi_acpi_dsm(struct ucsi_acpi *ua, int func)
 {
 	union acpi_object *obj;
 
-	obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(ACPI_HANDLE(ua->dev), ua->uuid.b, 1, func,
+	obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(ACPI_HANDLE(ua->dev), &ua->uuid, 1, func,
 				NULL);
 	if (!obj) {
 		dev_err(ua->dev, "%s: failed to evaluate _DSM %d\n",
-- 
2.11.0

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell