linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: MMU: fast write protect

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 4 Jul 2017 11:17:40 +0800
From:   Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@...il.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, mtosatti@...hat.com,
        avi.kivity@...il.com, rkrcmar@...hat.com
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        qemu-devel@...gnu.org, Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: MMU: fast write protect



On 07/03/2017 11:47 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> 
> On 03/07/2017 16:39, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 06/20/2017 05:15 PM, guangrong.xiao@...il.com wrote:
>>> From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...cent.com>
>>>
>>> Changelog in v2:
>>> thanks to Paolo's review, this version disables write-protect-all if
>>> PML is supported
>>
>> Hi Paolo,
>>
>> Do you have time to have a look at this new version? ;)
>> Or I should wait until the patchset of dirty ring-buffer is merged?
> 
> I will look at it soon, but I still plan to merge dirty ring buffer first.
> 
> Thanks for your understanding,

Sure, i fully understand, thank you for bearing my push. :)